Greenpeace International and Sea Shepherd Conservation Society…two “eco-warriors”, both trying to get our attention and stop the pain and suffering that we are inflicting on the Earth’s environment and it’s wildlife.
Both have different views and ideas on how to go about it. Yet one was “spawned” from the other…
Sea Shepherd was founded by Paul Watson, a co-founder of Greenpeace, and “voted out of office” by the results of his direct actions. Some say that is a good thing.. some say otherwise and that Greenpeace has gone soft over the years.
Paul Watson, environmental activist, was asked to leave Greenpeace because he yanked a club out of a hunter’s hand to protect a baby seal.
I would have done the same… My question is: Why didn’t the other Greenpeacers do that also ?
I tend to agree on the “gone soft” option.. gone are the days when Greenpeace activists would get stuck in and do the “dirty work”.
I was on the receiving end of a Greenpeace action when I was part of the security on Salisbury Plains, many years ago, guarding United States of America nuclear assets in the form of mobile missile launchers. With rows and rows of razor wire and many coils of barbed wire surrounding the whole area, thermal cameras, night vision, trip flares and RAF police dogs… Yet Greenpeace still stalked the darkness in the dead of night. Suddenly a trip flare goes off in a little copse of woods some 300 meters to the front.. I spot them running into the night on the thermal sight, they think they are unseen as they stop and confer what to do next. They stand there glowing white in the dim red darkness of the thermal sight image. Suddenly a commotion further around to the left of the curved perimeter razor wire fencing.. a shout from the darkness “They’re inside the wire…” The game is on…
A game for us.. but something deadly serious for the Greenpeace activists. If they had fallen within the razor wire they could have easily been cut very badly, had severed fingers or even killed if cut on the neck. It’s not called razor wire for nothing!
Over the years I’ve asked myself what motivates people to risk they’re lives of something so seemingly trivial… after all the US were there as a nuclear deterrent for us all.
After watching the anti-whaling campaigns over the years I’ve come to realise that I feel the same way as they did, back when they scaled the razor wire.
How things have changed…
Sea Shepherd doesn’t have the PR of Greenpeace, doesn’t have the publicity, doesn’t have the funding… yet they seem to have done more for the anti-whaling cause than Greenpeace ever could. They are what Greenpeace used to be… yet Greenpeace HQ seem to be more concerned with lining they’re own pockets with funds rather than doing what they should be doing and saving the environment and wild life.
Sea Shepherd would like them to return to the Southern Ocean. We need as much opposition to the whalers as possible. There is strength in diversity of tactics and of strategy. Greenpeace has stated that their campaign for this year is over. (What? The Japanese are still on the hunt for whales!) In other words they have enough footage, photos and a storyline to fuel another multi-million dollar fund-raising drive for the rest of the year.
This is Sea Shepherd
Captain Paul Watson of the Sea Shepherd vessel Steve Irwin said:
Now I know I may be sounding cynical here and perhaps I am but as a co-founder of Greenpeace I have to say that I am personally disgusted at this corporate, emotionless, exploitative annual ocean posing event that Greenpeace stages every year.
My message to them is simple. If you collect the money to save the whales then you should spend the money on saving the whales. And they do collect the money! That is an area that Greenpeace excels in. Tens of millions of pieces of direct mail appeals each year. Door to door and telephone solicitations. Online advertising, television ads, radio ads, magazine ads.
Greenpeace spends more on soliciting funds to save the whales than they spend on actually sending a ship to sea to save the whales. For example Greenpeace has booked the online advertising space for major Australian and New Zealand newspapers and for news outlets like Google for three solid months to coincide with their annual whale-a-thon marketing event.
And they only oppose whaling operations based on the popular appeal of the operation. You won’t see Greenpeace on the beaches in Taiji protecting dolphins or on the shores of the Faeroe Islands protecting pilot whales or in Neah Bay, Washington trying to stop the illegal killing of Grey whales by Makah Indians. Sea Shepherd covers all these places without ever once seeing a Greenpeacer in the area. The reason is simple, the market potential of these regional atrocities is small compared to taking on the Japanese whalers.
I’m sad to say that I agree whole heartedly with his views. The actions of Greenpeace HQ has brought shame on the whole Greenpeace foundation that have proved so popular and effective over the years. Continue Reading »

